Citizen Portal

Planning Commission backs Waddle conservation-easement support by amending Future Land Use Map to Agriculture

Smyth County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors (joint hearings noted) · June 1, 2026

Summary

The Planning Commission recommended amending the Future Land Use Map to identify several Waddle parcels as Agricultural to support a conservation easement request by the Virginia Outdoor Foundation on behalf of Greg and Kyli Waddle.

At the October 24 joint public hearing, Tommy Oravetz of the Virginia Outdoor Foundation presented on behalf of Greg and Kyli Waddle seeking to amend the Smyth County Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. The requested change would reclassify multiple parcels (Tax Map Nos. 64-A-5A, 64-A-6, 64-A-7, 64-A-20) from Village Residential and Commercial/Industrial to Agriculture to facilitate a conservation easement protecting roughly 600 of the Waddles’ acres.

Oravetz described karst features and cliff-side topography that make much of the property unsuitable for development; commissioners and staff discussed tax implications and permanence of easements. Commissioners noted trade-offs between preserving prime farmland and potential future development opportunities; after deliberation, the Commission moved to recommend the Board approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment to support the conservation easement. Subsequent minutes record that the Board remanded the Commission’s recommendation on Dec. 19 for further consideration, and later actions reflected mixed votes in December; staff explained easements are generally permanent and that certain acreage had previously been approved in the adjacent county.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source