Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trustee Teets presents ordinance to vacate alley after strip mall encroachment

Village of Stone Park Board of Trustees · November 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustee Loretta J. Teets presented Ordinance 25-15 to vacate portions of the public alley east of 1501 and 1505 North Mannheim Road after construction left approximately 18–20 feet encroaching on village-owned alley; the property owner paid legal and survey costs. The board was asked to consider approval at the meeting.

Trustee Loretta J. Teets presented Ordinance 25-15, proposing to vacate portions of the north–south public alley east of the properties commonly known as 1501 and 1505 North Mannheim Road and said the corresponding plat of survey was included in the board packet.

Mayor Beniamino Mazzulla explained the issue dated back several years when construction of the current strip mall resulted in roughly 18–20 feet of the structure encroaching into the public alley. He said a portion of that area legally belongs to the Village of Stone Park and that the property owner, Kambiz Shirazi, covered all legal and survey expenses required to resolve the encroachment and correct the plat of survey to prevent future legal complications.

Teets asked the board to approve the ordinance at that evening’s meeting; the minutes record that the ordinance was presented and approval was being sought but do not record any board vote on the ordinance itself.

If approved in a future action, vacating the alley would transfer the village’s interest in the specified portion of the alley and resolve the encroachment recorded in the plat of survey. The plat is referenced in the board packet but is not reproduced in these minutes. The minutes do not list a mover or seconder for approval of Ordinance 25-15 and do not show a vote outcome in the record of this meeting.

Next steps: the ordinance remained on the agenda as presented; the minutes reflect presentation and request for approval but do not record a formal decision at this meeting.