Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan And Fire Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board clears environmental review but pauses final signatures while sprinkler, hydrant and single-entrance safety issues are resolved
Summary
Planning staff recommended and the board approved a negative SEQRA declaration for an existing development site proposed to be used as a religious school/dormitory, but members insisted sprinkler designs, hydrant/fire-flow calculations and road/access improvements be engineered and approved before building occupancy or final signatures.
The Fallsburg Planning Board voted to issue a negative environmental declaration for a proposed change of use at an existing development site—clearing the way for detailed site-plan review—but expressed strong reservations about life-safety and infrastructure items that must be resolved before the applicant may occupy buildings that will house children.
Planner presented the SEQRA rationale, noting the project sits on an existing development footprint, will use municipal water and sewer capacity that the town engineer confirmed is currently adequate in the allocation chart, and that proposed building changes are primarily to bring structures into code compliance (including adding sprinklers). The board therefore approved a negative declaration, meaning no Environmental Impact Statement is required for the action as presented, although project approval remains separate and subject to permitting.
Representatives for the applicant said the Shaw building had an issued permit and that engineered sprinkler plans had been submitted and stamped. Fire Commissioner Paul and multiple board members expressed concern that the site has only a single entrance and that the nearest hydrant is several hundred feet downhill; they pressed for verified sprinkler hydraulics and water-line sizing that demonstrate sufficient fire flow to protect dormitories and allow safe occupancy. The board emphasized that TJ, the building official, must review and approve sprinkler engineering and that no chairman signature or occupancy permit will be issued until the required sprinkler, road, hydrant and fire-flow issues are resolved.
Staff also asked for a set of technical submissions—digital plan sets, lighting plans, hydrology and well testing, wetlands delineation, traffic study and final sewer design (noted as a 3,100 gallon/day system in progress)—so the board and county reviewers can complete a deeper technical review and, where needed, refer the application to the county for 239 review.
