Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floodplain Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission outlines floodplain approach to relocate playground and restroom facilities
Summary
Planning Commissioner Virginia Clark told the recreation committee that FEMA and state floodplain guidance constrain park design. The Planning Commission proposes zoning language allowing relocation of existing recreational structures within the floodway as a conditional use, subject to DRB review and possible hydrologic proof, to reduce repeated flood damage.
Virginia Clark, speaking in her capacity with the Planning Commission, briefed the committee on constraints and a draft zoning approach intended to let Richmond move park structures out of repeatedly flooded locations.
Clark said FEMA and state flood-hazard regulations take precedence and that there is no way to create a Park District that would override flood-hazard rules. The Planning Commission’s current approach is to allow relocation of pre-existing recreational structures within the floodway provided the move does not increase flood velocity, does not impair floodway functionality, and does not negatively impact adjoining properties. Such relocations would be treated as a conditional use subject to DRB (Development Review Board) approval and consultation with the state ANR office.
Technical requirements under consideration include measuring above-ground components (for example, counting and sizing pipes and structural members) so the DRB can determine whether a replacement or relocation increases obstruction in the floodway. Clark said that, when relocation is questionable, a hydrologic study may be required; guidance documents suggest modest expansions (on the order of up to 500 square feet) are sometimes allowable but that ANR input is necessary.
Practically, the Planning Commission proposed options such as removing the lower restroom and concession stand, installing one flood-resistant, handicap-accessible restroom near the road, relocating the playground to the less-velocities portion of the floodway (the ‘grassy null’), and considering replacement of the bandshell with an open pavilion to reduce flood impact. Cost and timeline constraints—structural engineering reviews and construction costs—were emphasized as significant factors.
Next steps Clark outlined: refine zoning language to define on-ground improvements and “recreational uses with structures,” obtain ANR guidance, present drafts to the DRB and selectboard, and prepare visuals/cost estimates to support public outreach and hearings.
