Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newcastle board outlines bond choice on ballot, explains budget adjustments ahead of open town meeting
Summary
At its June 9 meeting, the Select Board reviewed the FY2026 budget, explained a calculation error in the printed budget book, and laid out options for a ballot bond (up to $900,000) to fund capital road projects; the town manager urged voters to consider the bond to reduce next year’s immediate tax increase.
The Newcastle Select Board reviewed final budget materials on Monday and discussed whether voters should approve a bond to fund the town’s capital road program.
Town manager Kevin told the board that borrowing for the town’s larger projects could reduce the one‑year tax increase residents would otherwise face. "If you are concerned about your property taxes increasing, vote for the bond that would allow us the opportunity next week to reduce the amount needed to be raised in taxes," Kevin said, describing how bonding can spread costs over time.
Why it matters: The bond question — a warrant article on the referendum ballot — would authorize borrowing up to $900,000 for a multi‑year capital road program. Kevin said his recommendation would be to bond for the largest project (about $600,000) rather than borrowing for the entire slate, which he said would meaningfully change the immediate tax impact. He laid out estimates for different options and noted the board could still modify the capital program during the open town meeting portion of the event.
Board members reviewed turnout history for the ballot portion of annual town meeting and warned that voter participation is typically much lower when no statewide questions are on the ballot. Kevin noted the town often sees hundreds of voters when a state issue is present, but recent open‑meeting sessions drew just a few dozen participating residents.
Budget book glitch and next steps: Kevin reported a calculation error in the printed budget book affecting sums in several object‑code groupings; he said the summary totals are correct and that the incorrect line‑item sums amount to changes in the low tens of thousands of dollars (Kevin described the aggregate effect as "about $20,000" up to "almost $30,000"). He said the office will provide corrected figures and consult the town attorney to confirm the appropriate procedural fix before the open town meeting.
What’s next: The bond and other warrant items will go before voters in the secret‑ballot portion of annual town meeting; the open portion of the meeting is scheduled for next Monday at the Lincoln Academy cafeteria. Staff will distribute corrected budget pages to attendees and the public prior to that session.
