Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Camden County adopts tougher animal ordinance — adds 'potentially dangerous' classification and shelter requirements
Summary
After a public hearing, the board waived second reading and adopted amendments to Chapter 14 (Animals), adding definitions, tethering and shelter standards, a 'potentially dangerous dog' classification, and a repeat-offender clause; the ordinance was adopted by voice vote (tally not recorded).
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Camden County commissioners on Tuesday voted to adopt comprehensive amendments to Chapter 14 of the county code governing animals, adding new definitions, stricter tethering and shelter requirements, and a new ‘potentially dangerous dog’ classification aimed at addressing recurring animal-control incidents.
County staff summarized the package before the board, saying the revisions expand definitions (including electronic confinement systems and community-cast animals), set temperature thresholds and four-sided shelter requirements, tighten tethering rules (including weather-related limits and tether-weight caps), and create a potentially dangerous-dog designation for animals that bite or attack, are repeatedly found running at large, or demonstrate training or temperament indicating a propensity to injure animals or people.
“As we reviewed, we added that potentially dangerous dog clause,” staff said, describing criteria that include repeated running-at-large incidents and behavior indicating a propensity to injure. Staff told the board the classification will allow earlier intervention in escalating cases while preserving an appeal process: determinations must be made within 72 hours, and owners may appeal to probate court within seven days.
The ordinance also adds a repeat-offender provision and owner requirements for animals classified as dangerous or potentially dangerous, including insurance (staff cited a $50,000 policy threshold), signage, muzzling in public and limits on how many dangerous dogs a household may keep. Staff emphasized that euthanasia would only occur by judge’s order following the established legal process.
Why it matters: The revisions broaden the county’s enforcement options and set clearer, uniform standards for animal welfare and public safety across unincorporated areas and — under certain service agreements — in municipalities that receive county animal control services.
The board moved to waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance; the motion carried by voice vote (the transcript records “motion carries” but does not record a roll-call tally). Staff said the ordinance is intended to reduce public-safety risks from repeat incidents and improve humane conditions for animals.
What’s next: The ordinance takes effect under Camden County’s adoption procedures. Owners facing a classification may appeal to probate court within seven days, and staff will implement the newly articulated shelter, tethering and insurance requirements.

