Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Inspection Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board requires inspection and enforceable contingency after debate over 33 Lighthouse Road variance
Summary
After extended debate over inspection waivers and sewer phasing, the board approved a variance for 33 Lighthouse Road but required an inspection and directed staff to draft an enforceable agreement requiring a tight tank or similar measure if the system meets failure triggers (for example, three pump-outs in a season).
A protracted discussion at the Dennis Board of Health focused on whether to waive a transfer inspection under 310 CMR 15.3010.4 for a property at 33 Lighthouse Road, and concluded with the board approving a variance while insisting on an inspection plus a written contingency agreement.
Bob Perry of Cape Cod Engineering told the board that the property lies in an area where sewer phasing is expected and said the regulation cited "3 10 CMR 15 3 0 1 4" includes an exclusion for systems when there is an enforceable agreement that sewer hookup will occur within two years. Perry acknowledged timing uncertainty but asked whether the board would accept an enforceable agreement in place of an inspection.
Board members pushed back on a blanket waiver. One committee member said the board had "never ever allowed the transfer of properties on ownership without proper inspection" and opposed creating a precedent. The members coalesced around requiring an inspection first and crafting an agreement that would trigger a tighter interim measure if the system failed: for example, a requirement that after three pump-outs in a season, the owner (and buyer) would execute an agreement to install a tight tank or a temporary comfort station until sewer hookup was available.
The board instructed staff to draft the enforceable agreement between the health department and the owner (and buyer) that would include a grace period discussed at the meeting (board members discussed a four-year grace window) and trigger conditions for a tight tank. After the revision from a no-inspection recommendation in the memorandum to an approved inspection-plus-contingency approach, the board voted to approve the variance with that stipulation.
What happens next: Health staff will draft the enforceable agreement and seek signatures from the owner and buyer as part of the variance approval; the board will monitor any inspection results and enforce the contingency language if failure triggers occur.
