Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission grants preliminary approval for Key State Homes cluster plan despite neighbor concerns over wetlands and stormwater
Summary
Beachwood's Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary approval (4-0) for Key State Homes to build three clustered houses on a 1.22-acre parcel, while residents warned the project threatens wetlands and downstream flooding; final approval is contingent on Army Corps and Ohio EPA permitting and full engineering and stormwater plans.
The Beachwood Planning and Zoning Commission on March 20 granted preliminary site-plan approval to Key State Homes for a three-unit cluster development on a 1.22-acre parcel near Fairmont Boulevard, after extensive public comment about wetlands and stormwater and repeated assurances from staff that any mitigation and permit approvals would be required before final approval.
Residents and neighbors strongly opposed the project during public comment. Jared Schnall, of Fairwood Court, said the parcel is zoned for a single home and is nowhere near the two-acre minimum for cluster homes; he said Key State's proposal lacked a stormwater-management plan and asserted up to 60 nearby properties could be at risk if impervious surfaces increase runoff. David Steinberg, an adjacent property owner, described the three-structure layout as overcrowded for the site and warned that approving large variances would render the code meaningless. Ronald Kahn, president of the Fairwood Glen Homeowners Association, cited Beachwood ordinances and Ohio Administrative Code requirements for stormwater control and urged strict enforcement.
Applicant Andrew Gottlieb (Key State Homes) told the commission the plan had been reduced from five units to three, that setbacks and separation distances now meet cluster provisions, and that the plan preserves roughly one-third of an acre as wetlands. Gottlieb said his team has engaged Davie Resource for wetland delineation and has an engineer in place; he said the next step is to seek Army Corps of Engineers and Ohio EPA approvals for any mitigation and then return with final engineering.
Planning staff (Mr. Smarrigan) explained the U1 single-family district permits a cluster alternate and that the revised plan meets cluster-density and setback provisions, exceeds the code's open-space minimum (staff estimated open space above 50%), and eliminates earlier variances. Staff emphasized that final site-plan approval would require complete engineering, stormwater design, and documentation of any required Army Corps/EPA permits for wetland mitigation.
Given a reduced quorum (four voting members present), the applicant asked to proceed. Commissioner Bluedonald moved to approve P&Z item 2023-317 with stipulations including a practical-difficulty finding and a variance permitting development on 1.22 acres; Commissioner DeLong seconded. The motion passed on a recorded 4-0 vote. The preliminary approval is conditional: the developer must submit full engineering and obtain any Army Corps/Ohio EPA permits for wetland mitigation before the plan returns for final city approval.
The public record shows strong neighborhood opposition centered on flood and wetland concerns; the commission's action permits the applicant to proceed to the permitting stage but does not authorize construction until final engineering and external agency approvals are provided.
