Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Occupancy Inspections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake St. Louis aldermen continue debate over mandatory occupancy inspections; seek more analysis
Summary
A draft ordinance to require occupancy inspections on dwelling transfers was presented by City Administrator George Ertle. Alderman Joe Coyne urged limiting checks to the Fire District’s fire‑safety inspection and applying a citywide standard; several members requested more time and a comparison matrix before any vote.
City Administrator George Ertle presented a draft ordinance proposing mandatory occupancy inspections of dwelling units prior to transfer of ownership and provided the Board with a copy of the inspection report used by the Lake St. Louis Fire Protection District for the Board’s review.
Alderman Joe Coyne recommended narrowing the city requirement to the Fire District’s fire‑safety inspection rather than the broader ICC standard the draft referenced, and urged the Board to apply a consistent requirement citywide so residents outside the Fire District would be treated the same. Coyne also said staff could perform the inspections and suggested supplementing capacity with increased part‑time hours, while noting the Fire District’s scheduling limitations.
Alderman Jacalyn Schauer asked whether Coyne’s recommendation meant one inspection or two; Coyne clarified he was recommending a single fire‑safety inspection on property sale. Alderman Angela Bilkey asked for additional time and a comparison matrix showing the benefits and equity implications of a city‑mandated program vs. alternatives; Alderman Bill Behr agreed that more information was needed. Aldermen Chris Hinkle and Justin Hensley left the meeting at about 7:18 p.m. No formal action or vote on the ordinance occurred during the session.
Why it matters: A mandatory occupancy‑inspection ordinance would change conditions for property sales and could create new administrative tasks for staff or the Fire District. Board members emphasized the need to weigh equity for residents outside the Fire District, administrative burden, and inspection standards before advancing policy.
What’s next: Board members requested additional comparative information and time to consider options; staff will return with requested matrices and staffing/implementation details before the Board considers formal action.
