Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Manufactured Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Belfast planning staff recommend manufactured‑housing rule changes; board forwards measure to council
Summary
Planning staff proposed narrowing code language for manufactured‑housing communities, aligning lot and road standards with state minima and directing road tech specs to Maine Chapter 850; the board voted to recommend the amendments to city council for public hearings and two readings.
Planning Codes Director Bob Fournier told the Belfast Planning Board on Sept. 11 that staff had prepared a final draft of ordinance amendments intended to clarify lot, density and road standards for manufactured‑housing communities and to better align local rules with state minimums.
Fournier said the draft strips away unclear language about “roads in and roads out” and relies on the overall park density standard in the zoning code, while reducing the minimum Seward lot size from 6,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet where served by appropriate sewer. He also said that shared or central sewer lots would align with state minimums and that staff had consulted the city engineer and housing committee during drafting.
Board members asked technical questions about road construction oversight and testing. Louie Baker and others raised concerns about requiring frequent compaction or sieve testing on private roads because of cost; Fournier said that when a road is proposed to be transferred to the city it will be built and inspected to the city/engineer standard, while private roads commonly rely on engineer submittals and copies of compaction or sieve tests.
On road design, staff proposed deleting the city’s separate road construction standard for manufactured‑housing parks and directing applicants to the state of Maine technical road standards (chapter 850) unless and until a road is accepted by the city, at which point the city could require a higher specification.
Fournier acknowledged an inadvertent deletion of a density reference in one draft and said staff would restore the intended density language; the board retained that the overall park density remains regulated by the zoning district limits.
After discussion, the board voted to recommend the draft amendments to city council so the council can schedule public hearings and two readings before final adoption. Fournier told the board that council will typically hold two readings before a vote and that staff would forward the draft and the supporting materials.
