Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Attendance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Attendance improving in Norton schools; chronically absent rates falling toward pre-pandemic levels

Norton School Committee · April 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Brian Ackerman presented longitudinal attendance data showing district-wide daily attendance near the mid-to-high 90s, reductions in chronic absenteeism for high-needs students and other cohorts since the pandemic, and crediting targeted interventions funded partially by a DESE grant.

The Norton School Committee heard a data-driven update on April 15 showing steady improvements in attendance after pandemic-era spikes in chronic absenteeism.

Dr. Brian Ackerman, presenting longitudinal data from 2018 through part of 2026, framed attendance as a "traffic light" metric: 95% and above is green, 91—34% is a cautionary yellow, and 90% or below triggers concern about learning loss. He defined chronic absenteeism as missing 10% of school days (about 18 days) and said the district has focused interventions on cohorts with elevated risk.

Ackerman said the district-level daily attendance rate has hovered in the mid-to-high 90s and that 2025-26 shows gains over 2024-25 across several buildings. "If we can get to 95 and above... I think we'll all feel really good about that," he said.

The presentation highlighted disproportionate impacts during and after COVID on high-needs students, students with disabilities and English-language learners. Ackerman and committee members noted notable reductions from '24-'25 to '25-'26 and attributed progress to coordinated efforts including DESE grant-funded capacity building, updated student-handbook policies, and guidance-team interventions.

Committee members asked about excused versus unexcused absences and how the data are reported; Ackerman said DESE data do not distinguish excused from unexcused in the daily-attendance rate but chronic-absence metrics drive intervention. The committee praised staff for the work and noted further attention to pockets of need remains important.

No formal votes were required; the presentation was informational and will inform ongoing attendance interventions.