Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vacant Property Discussion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant withdraws from vacant-property program after assessor values 11 Fountain Street at about $75,000
Summary
Mora Burgess declined to proceed with a vacant-property recovery application for 11 Fountain Street after a county assessment of roughly $75,000 made rehabilitation financially infeasible; council discussed demolition, conservatorship, back taxes and estimated rehab at $170,000–$200,000 and demo at ~$15,000.
At the June 11 Crafton Borough council meeting, staff reported that an applicant, Mora Burgess, withdrew her vacant-property recovery program application for 11 Fountain Street after receiving an unexpected county assessment valuing the parcel at about $75,000. The higher-than-expected assessment made the proposed rehabilitation unworkable for the applicant.
Manager Mr. F. and council members described the property as suffering substantial water damage and said the county’s assessed purchase price (about $75,000) together with likely rehabilitation costs—estimated in the meeting at $170,000 to $200,000—left little chance that rehabilitation would be financially viable. Council members cited an estimated demolition cost of roughly $15,000 if the borough were to budget for demolition directly. Meeting participants also noted unpaid taxes on the parcel going back to 2008 as an additional complication.
Council discussed alternatives including conservatorship (where a conservator takes control to rehabilitate and can be compensated), land-bank transfer, or borough-funded demolition followed by re-enrollment in the vacant-property program as a cleared lot. Participants agreed the county program is typically more effective for vacant land than for structures with extensive damage and that land-bank rules may exclude properties with severe water damage.
Why it matters: the exchange illustrates how county assessment and program rules can change the practical options for returning blighted or risky properties to productive use. The transcript records estimates and council judgments rather than definitive cost accounting or a final borough commitment to demolish.
What’s next: staff agreed to examine back taxes and schedule follow-up conversations with the applicant to clarify whether a conservatorship or a budgeted borough demolition would be pursued; any formal action would return to council for approval.
Source: Crafton Borough Council meeting, June 11, 2026 (Manager and council discussion).
