Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board to draft rules after private‑runway incident; staff to return with language
Summary
Following the Freeman/Colby discussion, staff will draft minimal land‑use language to require private‑runway or helipad proposals to appear before the planning board with basic site information; members suggested limits on lighting and hours and wetlands checks.
The board discussed whether to regulate private runways and helipads after the Freeman/Colby matter highlighted the issue. Staff said state statute currently allows aircraft takeoffs and landings on private land by an owner or resident unless local land‑use regulation specifically prescribes otherwise.
Members favored drafting a modest regulatory approach that would treat a runway or helipad as a change of use requiring a planning‑board appearance and basic submission materials (sketch of runway, hangar location and proposed hours). Suggestions included prohibiting nighttime lighting, limiting hours of operation, and requiring minimal wetlands or alteration-of‑terrain checks rather than full engineering submittals.
Mark (staff) said he would draft proposed language with general criteria and present it at the next meeting for vetting; the board agreed that the first draft should be pragmatic and avoid imposing excessive engineering costs for small, owner‑use facilities.
