Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technology Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parents, doctors urge Wilmette SD 39 to curb kindergarten and first-grade iPad use, citing brain-development concerns

Wilmette SD 39 Board of Education · June 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the June 15 Board of Education meeting, parents and medical experts urged Wilmette SD 39 to remove routine iPad use from kindergarten and first grade and tighten app/privacy controls districtwide, citing studies and classroom effects; administrators said the district is reviewing guidance and monitoring tools.

At the Wilmette SD 39 Board of Education meeting on June 15, a string of parents and experts urged the board to sharply limit routine iPad and screen use for the district's youngest students.

Dr. Elizabeth Harris, who identified herself as a neurologist and a District 39 parent, told the board that brain wiring during K-5 is vulnerable to environmental exposures and summarized research linking higher screen time to weaker connectivity in language and impulse-control circuits. "For each additional one hour of screen time, it points to a 9 to 10% lower odds of meeting grade-level benchmarks in reading and math," Dr. Harris said, adding that kindergarteners exceeding one hour daily were "developmentally vulnerable across every domain." She asked the board to "consider removing iPads from the kindergarten and first grade classrooms and limiting screen time thereafter to designated tech learning labs."

Several parents amplified Harris's message. Rachel Ginsburg, who said she worked at Google for eight years, said families are increasingly choosing schools that delay routine device exposure and urged a more developmentally appropriate technology policy. Elena Rednik told the board she and a local parent group have identified roughly "200 approved apps" on district-issued devices and said that about 180 of them were approved for early elementary grades; she asked for clearer, grade-level policies and more visibility into what children can access. Max Resnik raised concerns about AI frameworks and student access to unapproved content in Safari and other apps.

Administrators described changes already underway. The district said it has moved elementary iPads to remain at school, blocked YouTube on student devices and networks, added filtering categories, increased monitoring tools, and issued guidance on responsible AI use for staff and families. "We refocused teaching and learning practices with an emphasis on active learning versus passive learning," a district presenter said, and confirmed the district is evaluating screening tools and reporting methods related to student social-emotional needs.

Board members did not take an immediate policy vote on screen use during the meeting. The issue drew repeated calls for clearer, grade-by-grade technology rules, explicit app lists and limits, and stronger parental communication; several public commenters said they would pursue petitions and follow-up with the district.

The meeting provided a second public comment period later in the agenda during which Dr. Harris returned to reiterate her request that the district "follow the science" and promptly communicate any policy changes to families. The board and administration said they would incorporate community feedback as they finish the district's strategic planning and policy work over the summer.