Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aspen commission backs 6-key boutique lodge at landmark 320 West Main with preservation conditions
Summary
The Aspen Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to approve a certificate of appropriateness and commercial design review for 320 West Main Street, recommending City Council consider a planned development and growth-management review for conversion to a six-key boutique lodge while requiring a preservation plan and site visit to identify interior elements to protect.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Aspen Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to approve a certificate of appropriateness for minor development and commercial design review for 320 West Main Street and recommended that City Council consider the planned development and growth-management reviews needed to convert the individually designated landmark into a six‑key boutique lodge.
Sarah Adams of Bend and Adams, representing owners Scott Kaye and Kate Dallas, told the commission the proposal would convert the Smith/Elijah landmark to a small boutique lodge with six lodge keys (rooms), limited on-site food service for guests only, and an on‑site employee to manage arrivals, deliveries and neighbors’ concerns. Adams said the design minimizes exterior alterations, includes an ADA lift accessed from the rear porch, and keeps historic interior features such as the main stair and fireplaces intact.
Staff and the applicant asked the commission to weigh a plan-development route because the land‑use code sets a 10‑key minimum for boutique lodges. Jillian, a staff project monitor, and Ben Anderson, the city’s Community Development Director, told the commission staff supports a positive recommendation to council if conditions are added to formalize interior preservation. Anderson explained that the land‑use code requires 0.5 parking spaces per key — three spaces for six keys — but a recorded plat note tied to the prior lot split means the two existing on‑site spaces meet the entitlement for this parcel.
Neighbors urged caution. Bill Toler, who lives behind 320 West Main, said his written comments and prior experience showed repeated alley blockages, deliveries and cars left overnight; he argued a six‑key approval would set a precedent and exacerbate alley congestion and emergency‑access risks. Kevin DeCarlo, manager of nearby Copper Horse employee housing, asked how snow removal and drainage between narrow buildings would be handled.
Adams and staff responded that the required development agreement and an operational plan — which will be recorded with the city — provide an enforceable management structure, including an on‑site point of contact to manage parking, deliveries and neighborhood complaints. The applicant also offered a contribution to the local bike‑share program and said deliveries would be routed to the alley as required.
On a motion by the chair, amended to add historic transoms and hardware to the list of protected elements and to require (1) submission of a preservation plan that maps locations of interior elements and any proposed relocations, and (2) a site visit to identify additional elements to be included in the preservation list, the commission voted yes on the staff resolution (resolution number 1, series of 2026). The motion also directed that the commission recommend approval of growth‑management review but take no position on the applicant’s requested fee‑in‑lieu mitigation method for affordable housing, which is a council decision.
Key project facts: the property is listed on the National Register and is in the Main Street Historic District; the proposal would convert roughly 3,900 square feet of leasable commercial space into six lodge keys, allocate 12 pillows from the annual allotment for a lodge, and generate an affordable‑housing mitigation obligation equivalent to 2.34 full‑time equivalents. The lodge would have a maximum occupancy of about 12 people and on‑site staff to manage operations.
The commission’s recommendations and the record of neighborhood concerns will be forwarded to City Council for its review of the planned development, growth‑management mitigation and any decisions about mitigation method (fee‑in‑lieu vs. on‑site housing or other options).
