Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BZA allows McNeil Farm a private pavilion but requires non‑commercial use and runoff protections
Summary
The board approved a variance to allow a third accessory structure — a 22-by-24-foot private pavilion at McNeil Farm — imposing conditions that the structure not be used commercially, that runoff not affect neighbors, and that easements be coordinated with the City of Kent.
The Brimfield Township Board of Zoning Appeals granted a variance on March 11 to allow a third accessory structure on a 72‑acre parcel owned by McNeil Farm, permitting construction of a roughly 22‑by‑24‑foot pavilion intended for private, family use.
Tom Demrovsky, representing Ridgewood Contracting and speaking for the property owner, said the pavilion will be set well back from Mogadore Road on the family farm and will not be used for commercial or rental activity. He confirmed the structure would include water and electricity. The request required relief from Resolution Section 510.03(A), which limits most lots to two accessory buildings.
The board read a letter from Melanie Baker, Service Director for the City of Kent, noting she met with Zoning Inspector Mike Hlad and raised no objection provided the use remains residential and existing easements are not impacted. Neighbor Kevin Herring, whose letter was also read into the record, said he supported the variance "if the pavilion is for personal use only" and expressed concern about potential water runoff; Demrovsky responded that the site is on high ground and he expected runoff to be absorbed by the land.
Vince Murdocco moved to grant the variance with three stipulations: the property not be used for any commercial purpose now or in the future; water runoff must be handled so neighboring properties are not affected; and easement locations and concerns should be coordinated directly with the City of Kent. Ed Shutty seconded (MOTION#2026-13). The motion carried unanimously among members present.
The minutes record no plan for a gravel parking area and state the existing driveway provides access; the board required adherence to easement and runoff conditions but did not record additional technical stormwater measures in the minutes.
