Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parkland Transfer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss Parkland transfer and potential housing site; no action taken
Summary
Commissioners discussed the transfer of roughly 1,700 acres purchased by a Conservancy/Western Rivers entity and a smaller parcel called Jubilee Ranch that could be suitable for housing; staff said details about deed, reimbursement and restrictions are unresolved and the commission asked staff to consider a future briefing.
At the May 28 meeting, commissioners spent substantial time discussing the status and potential uses of parkland that Western Rivers (referred to in the record as a Conservancy purchaser) bought from Park Cattle Company (David Park) and the pathway for transferring management or ownership to Alpine County.
Donnie raised the topic as an informal item and asked what stage the transfer was at and whether the Conservancy would convey the land to the state or directly to the county. "If the Conservancy bought it, then the state has to buy it from the Conservancy and then the state gives it to Alpine," Donnie said, seeking clarity on reimbursement and transfer steps. Staff responded that they believe "the Conservancy deeds it straight to Alpine County, but I I'm not fully sure" and said the Conservancy is typically reimbursed through grant programs.
Commissioners discussed a smaller portion of the transfer—described in the record as approximately 3 to 5 acres commonly called the Jubilee Ranch—that appears to have utilities nearby (commercial power, water and sewer) and might be considered for limited housing, including for county employees. Staff cautioned that the property is likely restricted for open-space uses and subject to an agricultural lease, and that Western Rivers "is essentially just a manager of the land" in the current arrangements discussed with the Board of Supervisors. There was no proposal or motion to change land-use designations.
Commissioners asked staff to prepare more information. The chair proposed scheduling a briefing for a future meeting; staff said they would consult subject-matter staff (including Sam) and the Board of Supervisors and could agendize the item if appropriate. No formal action or vote was taken.
