Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board considers procedural changes; residents urge clearer public presentation of zoning changes
Summary
At the end of the meeting the board reviewed proposed changes to rules and procedures (training encouragement for new members, minutes distribution timing, and secretary duties) and heard public comments urging a simple tabular summary of changes for voters and cautioning about overreliance on special exceptions.
The Enfield Planning Board discussed proposed revisions to its rules and procedures and heard public comment asking for clearer public materials ahead of hearings.
Board member Dave (from the public) suggested producing a concise table that compares the current zoning, last year’s proposals and this year’s recommended changes so voters can readily see what differs. "Provide a simple tabular format of the significant changes between current... the proposals last year and the differences," Dave said during general public comment.
On internal procedures, the board reviewed a draft insertion encouraging (but not requiring) new members to familiarize themselves with the New Hampshire Planning Board Handbook and to complete the online test within 90 days of appointment; members agreed it is useful but voiced concerns about whether it can be a mandatory requirement. The board also discussed adding town contractors to a secretary’s delegation list and whether a secretary should be required to pre‑review minutes before presenting them to the board given the timing constraints for draft distribution.
Members proposed a timing clarification that posted materials be distributed "not later than the Friday preceding a scheduled meeting" and discussed keeping meeting‑schedule text out of the rules to avoid frequent updates. On the agenda order, members favored allowing the chair reasonable discretion to alter agenda order while still ensuring required topics are covered.
Resident Sharon Buffet urged the board to be cautious about how frequently it relies on special exceptions because that pathway can be viewed as inconsistent or unclear by applicants; board members confirmed special exceptions apply only to listed uses in the ordinance and pointed listeners to the zoning text that enumerates available special exceptions in each district.
Next steps: staff and the rules drafter will circulate a marked‑up version for additional feedback and the board will consider how to present a public‑facing summary of zoning changes before hearings and the warrant timeline.
