Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Instruction And Student Support topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District pilots P.E.T.S thinking-skills program; board debates third-grade retention policy and supports interventions

Beaufort County Board of Education · June 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Beaufort County School District presented a pilot primary thinking-skills curriculum (P.E.T.S.) for 1st–2nd graders and an updated review of third-grade retention law and research; board members pressed for details on early interventions, social-work capacity and literacy coaching.

Scarlett Mooney, the district's director of tides and academic special programs, told the Beaufort County Board of Education on June 24 that Primary Education Thinking Skills (P.E.T.S.) was piloted this year in four elementary schools and is slated for broader implementation in 2025-26.

"P.E.T.S. is a systemized enrichment and diagnostic tool rooted in Bloom's Taxonomy," Mooney said, describing characters and scaffolded lessons that teach convergent, divergent and evaluative thinking. She said the program targets 1st and 2nd grades, includes teacher training and aligns to later coursework and district assessment strategies.

Board members followed with extensive questioning about the evidence base and implementation. The presenter and other staff summarized the research: P.E.T.S. is established, with several decades of evidence supporting thinking-skill instruction, and the district paired the pilot with teacher professional learning and GT lead teachers in each building to support rollout.

The second presentation addressed third-grade retention changes in state law and the district's decision framework. Staff summarized the updated statutory thresholds (noting the cited cut-score change to 489 for mandatory retention pathways), listed four "good-cause" exemptions and described the decision tree schools use to notify families, provide interventions and determine summer-school placement or retention petitions. Presenters reviewed several studies including ones in Mississippi, New York City, Louisiana and a Harvard analysis, and cautioned that research results vary by state cut scores and cannot always isolate whether gains reflect intervention or other factors such as motivation.

Board members asked how early interventions in 1st and 2nd grade are deployed to reduce later retention risk. Staff pointed to P.E.T.S., the state-led science-of-reading rollout (including Wilson Reading and LETRS training for earlier-grade teachers), the district's use of I-Ready diagnostic tools, and literacy coaches and reading-plus programs at the middle level. The district also said it will pilot two additional wraparound positions (one each for Whale Branch Elementary sites) to increase family support and address absenteeism without increasing net cost by reallocating existing budgets.

Members asked for a future academic-committee presentation from the lead social worker and for metrics on coach and social-worker caseloads; staff agreed to return with more detailed implementation data to show how interventions are being used and measured.

The board did not take a formal policy vote on retention at this meeting; it accepted the informational presentations and asked for follow-up, including data on interventions, service staffing and outcomes.