Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newport council orders prepayment review after audit flags leave‑pay errors
Summary
A 2024 legislative audit cited noncompliance in the offices of the mayor and clerk/treasurer over unused‑leave payments; the City Council unanimously directed the mayor or city clerk to review leave‑payment calculations before disbursement.
Get email alerts on the Audit And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mayor Ratliffe told the Newport City Council on Oct. 6 that the city had received the 2024 Legislative Audit Report, which found "noncompliance with state law and accepted accounting practices" in the offices of the Mayor and Clerk/Treasurer.
The audit review, which Mayor Ratliffe summarized for the council, identified two individuals who were paid a total of $1,673 in unused vacation leave in excess of the maximum allowed by city policy and one individual who was underpaid $849 for unused vacation leave in apparent noncompliance with Ark. Code Ann. 14-52-106. The report also found that the person responsible for maintaining leave records received overpayments of $538 and $179 and began receiving payment for unused leave three months before retirement; that individual later reimbursed the city for those amounts, the mayor said.
After discussion, Council member Carol Falwell moved and Regina Lake seconded a motion directing that the Mayor or City Clerk review calculation of unused leave payments before they are issued to ensure compliance with city policy; the motion carried 8-0. The action follows the audit recommendation that the city investigate remaining unused leave payments to determine whether previous payments were calculated properly.
City Clerk/Treasurer Hembrey had received and distributed an electronic copy of the city's financial statements with the council packet and was identified by the mayor as the contact for any follow-up questions on the city's accounting records.
Next steps: The council's unanimous motion requires the mayor or city clerk to review future unused‑leave payment calculations before payments are made. The audit recommended a broader investigation of prior unused‑leave payments; the council motion implements a prepayment control but does not specify a timeline for a retroactive audit of past payments.
