Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Engineer lays out options and funding for rural water extension; estimated costs vary widely

Mills County Board of Supervisors · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County Engineer presented routing options, pressure constraints and funding scenarios for a proposed water-line extension serving clusters of residents, with early cost estimates ranging from about $700,000 for a segment to $1.5–$1.8 million for a larger loop and potential USDA/CDBG support.

County Engineer Jacob Ferrell presented plans and financing scenarios for a proposed rural water extension intended to serve several groups of residents who lack reliable well water.

Ferrell showed route options and explained system constraints: existing low-pressure dead ends, the need for an 8-inch line in some segments, and potential tie-ins to larger systems to access higher-pressure zones. He said the rough estimated construction cost for a short segment is "about 700 to $750,000," and for a larger loop the estimate is "1.5 to 1.8" million dollars, both preliminary and subject to design-stage refinement.

Funding options discussed included USDA participation, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding (Ferrell said up to $500,000 could help offset costs), and use of local LMI-designated funds if residents qualify; a $3,000 hookup fee was mentioned as a likely facility fee and could be reinvested into initial mains. Ferrell said a final project cost requires completed design, public bidding and regulatory reviews (DNR) and that realistic service timelines would likely push construction into 2027.

Board members asked about cost-sharing and the number of potential hookups; one supervisor said the board could consider contributing 10–20% of costs from LMI funds to reduce per-user charges. Ferrell recommended returning with a firm design and cost estimate so USDA and CDBG applications could proceed.