Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves multiple land transfers, joint-development agreements and project incentives
Summary
Richland County Council closed several public hearings and approved resolutions and first readings authorizing transfers of county parcels to SCDOT, joint development with Fairfield County on the Riverfront Business Park, and a first-reading tax-incentive agreement for Project Chesterfield.
Richland County Council on June 16 closed public hearings and advanced several ordinances and resolutions that will facilitate roadway improvements, multi-county park development and economic development incentives.
The council opened and closed public hearings on numerous right-of-way and parcel transfers to the South Carolina Department of Transportation for intersection and roadway widening projects at multiple locations. There were no speakers for those hearing items.
Council also considered and approved the concept of a multi-county Riverfront Business Park in partnership with Fairfield County, including authorizing execution of a master agreement and related intergovernmental agreements. The item was presented as a joint-development authorization and moved forward without public testimony at this meeting.
On economic development, the Economic Development Committee recommended, and council approved, a resolution to negotiate fee-in-lieu (FEI)/tax-incentive arrangements tied to Project Chesterfield and authorized first-reading consideration of an Avalon tax/incentive agreement associated with that project. Committee members framed the actions as standard practice to secure jobs and infrastructure commitments under negotiated incentive frameworks.
Council also held a public hearing on an ordinance authorizing up to $12 million in general-obligation bonds for fire-protection capital improvements; the hearing included public comment that urged dedicated funding for fire needs.
None of the transfer or joint-development items required additional public speakers at the meeting; Council members indicated staff and intergovernmental negotiations would continue on contract details and any necessary future readings.
