Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance Pilot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves teacher attendance pilot amid debate on bereavement, quarter-day rules and substitute staffing
Summary
The committee approved a teacher attendance pilot that recognizes perfect attendance with tiered payments paid twice yearly; members debated whether exceptions (bereavement, PD, jury duty) should be carved out, and discussed quarter-day accounting and the cost of hiring full-time substitute positions.
The Pocahontas School District PPC committee voted to recommend a teacher attendance pilot intended to recognize employees with perfect attendance through tiered recognition payments issued twice a year.
Staff presented the pilot and said recognition payments would be issued in January and June and would recognize perfect-attendance windows (quarter/semester) with tiered payments. Committee member Molly moved to approve the pilot “as presented”; the motion was seconded and carried.
Debate centered on scope and exceptions. Staff said the pilot as drafted treats attendance as “feet on campus” and does not automatically carve out bereavement, jury duty or other absences; committee members asked whether bereavement should be exempted. The staff presenter explained the district’s leave policy currently allows “up to three days to attend the funeral” and that approvals have been handled case-by-case; staff said any formal change to that policy would need committee and board consideration.
Members also raised operational questions: whether the pilot would require a gatekeeper to approve exceptions, whether quarter-day accounting for short appointments could reduce the need for full-day substitutes, and whether the district should hire rotating aides or full-time substitutes to cover short absences. Staff noted a full-time certified substitute position may cost roughly $50,000 and cautioned that adding such positions would only help if it reduced sub-fund spending rather than increasing net costs.
Several members voiced concern that an attendance incentive could unintentionally encourage staff to work while sick. One staff speaker summarized the intended approach: “You’re either here or you’re not,” meaning the pilot emphasizes physical presence rather than creating multiple carve-outs; other members urged framing the program as positive recognition rather than punishment.
The committee approved the pilot and directed staff to move the item to the board for approval and to return with implementation details (eligibility windows, exact payment tiers and payroll timing).
