Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer presents revised concept for Meadowbrook subdivision; neighbors split on density and traffic

Waukesha City Planning Commission · December 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Viridian Homes presented a revised Winterberry Reserve / Springs at Meadowbrook plan emphasizing mixed lot sizes, rear alleys and narrower 40–45 ft lots in the center; neighbors and commissioners commended some changes but raised traffic, tree‑preservation and blasting concerns.

Viridian Homes returned to the Planning Commission on Dec. 18 with a revised conceptual plan for the Springs at Meadowbrook (also referred to as Winterberry Reserve), proposing a mix of lot sizes including narrow 40–45 foot carriage‑lane lots served by private alleys, larger perimeter lots to buffer existing neighborhoods, architectural controls that emphasize front porches, and a unit count reduced to about 79 homes.

Presenters Ben Lang and Brian Munson outlined design changes since the last meeting: more generous perimeter lots on the north and east, a tighter central block of narrow lots with rear alleys and off‑alley parking, and revised stormwater and grading strategies to minimize impact on existing specimen trees and known wet soils. Staff recommended further refinement of setbacks, front‑yard treatment and alley width (20 feet minimum to meet fire department preferences) as the project progresses.

Public comment included both opposition and qualified support. Several residents cited traffic safety on Summit Avenue, pedestrian sight‑line issues, and concerns about blasting if basements are used; other neighbors and the alderman said the revised plan reduced impacts, preserved more trees along the perimeter and could provide housing choices at price points between existing stock and high‑end homes. Commissioners asked the developer to incorporate stronger anti‑monotony design standards, confirm blasting plans and mitigation, provide a tree preservation strategy, and show how stormwater for the northern wet spots will be handled.

This was a consultation and no formal action was taken; the developer will return with detailed engineering, a PUD application if needed, and responses to the commission’s technical and design comments.