Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves several utility location permits but denies pole move at 58 Taylor Street after resident opposition
Summary
The City Council approved multiple Mass Electric/National Grid grant‑of‑location petitions on March 16 but denied a proposal to move a pole at 58 Taylor Street after neighbors and a petition opposed the relocation that would eliminate on‑street parking. One Sagamore Street petition remains in committee pending additional information.
Quincy City Council on March 16 approved four utility grant‑of‑location orders for pole and utility adjustments but voted down one proposal after sustained neighborhood opposition.
During a string of public hearings before committee, the council considered permit requests that included Mass Electric and Verizon relocations at 100 Cottington Street (2026‑020), 587 C Street (2026‑021), 10 Independence Avenue (2026‑022), 58 Taylor Street (2026‑023) and 137 Sagamore Street (2026‑025). The clerk read public‑notice instructions at the start of each hearing and invited speakers to sign in or state opposition from the podium.
The most contested petition, 2026‑023 for 58 Taylor Street, drew multiple neighbors who said moving the utility pole and cutting a curb would eliminate critical on‑street parking and worsen access for residents with mobility limitations. Daniel Lynn, speaking for the owners at 58 Taylor, said the pole sits near the middle of a shared driveway and that moving it would facilitate driveway widening for the developer. "If we were to move the pole further in ... we'll have full unfettered access to our driveway," Lynn said. Nearby resident Sha said a petition signed by 10 households opposed the move because it would reduce parking and disrupt elderly and caregiving households.
A National Grid representative, Jim Pierce, said the developer requested the pole be moved to accommodate construction of a new building and that the pole being relocated is about 18 inches in diameter. Councilor Hubley said he had reviewed resident letters and would vote against relocation when the matter reached committee.
After committee consideration and a later roll‑call at full council, the body denied the 58 Taylor Street grant (2026‑023). The council approved the grant‑of‑location orders for 100 Cottington (2026‑020), 587 C Street (2026‑021), 10 Independence (2026‑022) and Willard Street (2026‑024) by unanimous roll call. Order 2026‑025 (137 Sagamore Street) was left in committee for additional information after neighbors raised concerns about a curb that appeared to have been installed during repaving and the presence of an apparent gas pipe in a driveway; developer representative Gui Ming Hong explained a settlement agreement and construction timeline and said closing on an adjacent property was delayed.
Councilors stated they rely on resident input in evaluating right‑of‑way changes that affect street parking and pedestrian access. Where neighbor opposition centered on loss of scarce on‑street parking and safety for residents with limited mobility, the council recorded those concerns in its votes.
Next steps: The council left 2026‑025 in committee and directed staff to provide any missing plan details and to confirm the authorities and approvals for the gas line that residents reported. The denied 58 Taylor petition will not proceed as proposed.
