Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Term Limits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aspen council opens path to term limits for advisory boards, leans toward three-term cap
Summary
Councilors discussed term limits at a May work session focused on the Kids 1st and Wheeler advisory boards, heard that permanent boards are exempt under the charter, and directed staff to return with ordinance language and improved appointment tracking; several members signaled support for a three-term maximum with a one-term pause before reapplying.
At a City of Aspen work session, council members discussed options to limit how long volunteers may serve on advisory boards, focusing on the Kids 1st Advisory Board and the Wheeler Opera House Advisory Board.
Nicole Henning, Aspen city clerk, told the council that the city charter prevents term limits for permanent boards such as the planning commission and board of adjustments and that only the electorate can change that restriction. She said staff had not reviewed all 14 boards and commissions but recommended concentrating on non‑permanent boards where council can set term limits by ordinance.
Staff explained that the Kids 1st Advisory Board was established by Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2020, is composed of seven members plus two alternates, and uses three‑year overlapping terms; its bylaws allow members to reapply and be reconfirmed without coming back before council. The Wheeler board is also non‑permanent, has seven members and an ex‑officio seat, and its bylaws address vacancies differently than Kids 1st.
Council members weighed the benefits of institutional knowledge against the value of bringing in new perspectives. “I’d much rather see two or three terms as the maximum,” said Council member Bill, arguing that mandatory reappointments and interviews would create opportunities for fresh applicants while allowing experienced volunteers to serve their terms. Several council members favored a three‑term cap with a required gap of one term before a former member could reapply; staff said limits could take effect at reappointment after an ordinance’s effective date so current members would not be immediately removed.
Board members and staff cautioned that some boards struggle to attract applicants. “Sometimes we don’t have any applicants,” said Megan Monahan, representing the Kids 1st board, noting that continuity can be important for program delivery and training new members is resource intensive.
Council asked staff to return with draft ordinance language, to start tracking appointment dates and term counts in interview packets, and to evaluate whether similar rules should apply to other non‑permanent boards. Staff also discussed safeguards to avoid large, simultaneous turnover (staggering implementation or limiting how many seats can 'term out' in a single cycle).
The work session produced direction rather than formal action: council did not adopt an ordinance but instructed staff to draft options consistent with the council’s preferences and to report back with possible language and impacts.
