Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board tables 176-acre annexation after months of debate on drainage, sewer and roads
Summary
Directors voted to table ordinance 25-30 on the proposed annexation of 176 acres near Highway 59 and Bill Young Road, citing unresolved questions about drainage, sewer extension, road upgrades and developer intent; the item was scheduled to return on Nov. 18.
The Siloam Springs Board of Directors voted to table an ordinance proposing the annexation of roughly 176 acres along Arkansas Highway 59 and Bill Young Road after extended debate about infrastructure, drainage and community impacts.
Senior planner Ben Rhodess introduced the annexation proposal and said the request would bring two zoning designations into the city (A1 and R2) and require amendments to the future land-use map. Rhodess noted sanitary sewer was not currently available to the property and emphasized the annexation did not obligate the city to extend sewer service using taxpayer funds.
Multiple directors raised concerns about storm drainage and downstream effects to Sager Creek, long runs of sewer mains, escalation of city costs given current utility finances and the potential for county road projects to be delayed when annexation is discussed. "We need to look at our infrastructure, where we're at with our budget, and how it's going to affect the citizens that are currently citizens inside the city limits," Director Lisa said during the debate.
Blake Murray of Craft & Toll, representing the potential developer, told the board his early engineering work shows gravity sewer profiles may be feasible without lift stations and that a traffic study and additional neighborhood outreach are planned. "I've done some quick sewer profiles. No lift stations needed. We can gravity everything to the south," Murray said, offering to return with more detailed technical studies.
Vice Mayor Brad moved to table the ordinance indefinitely so staff and the applicant could address the boards questions; the motion was amended to set a return date for the board's Nov. 18 meeting. The board voted in favor of tabling by roll call (Ristler, Allen, Carol, Burns, Wilds and Hunt voted yes). City staff said the Nov. 18 timing preserved the public-notice continuity required by ordinance and state statute.
The board's action pauses any further consideration of rezoning or approval steps until the applicant provides additional technical details and the city coordinates with county officials on roads and drainage plans. The public will be notified per the city's normal notice procedures when the item returns to the agenda.
No formal zoning or annexation approvals were adopted at the meeting.
