Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dennis committee weighs traffic-calming options for Old Bass River and neighborhood streets

Dennis Public Works/Transportation Committee · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A town committee reviewed resident requests for added signage and speed-control measures at Old Bass River Road and other neighborhood streets, discussed liability limits on speed bumps and the role of MassDOT enforcement, and recommended DPW follow-up and possible advisory signage.

The Dennis Public Works/Transportation Committee spent a large portion of its meeting reviewing local traffic-calming requests, particularly at the Old Bass River Road/Main Street intersection and several neighborhood locations.

A resident who lives near the post office (speaker S5) urged the committee to consider more visible markers and temporary speed-control measures, saying the existing concrete posts are faded and posting photos would help the town evaluate options. S5 suggested sandblasting or repainting the posts and testing temporary plastic speed bumps observed behind the post office.

Tom (speaker S4), a town staff member working with DPW, responded that sharp speed bumps are a liability on public roads and that permanent speed tables are considered only at locations with expected pedestrian crossings. He said alternatives the town uses include reflectorized plastic delineators and engineered speed tables placed where a crossing is appropriate, and noted that anything placed in the public right-of-way must be approved and maintained by the town.

Committee members discussed private-property devices versus public installations. S4 noted temporary plastic bumps on private land are permissible but cautioned against placing any device in the town right-of-way because of liability. S4 also said the town has a work order for curve signs in some locations and is updating its sign and light inventory after the previous sign technician retired.

Committee members reported mixed results from site observations: one resident (S6) said a flashing speed sign at 3 Split Rock Road did not show widespread speeding during repeated short watches, while others said speed trailers and periodic police presence can temporarily reduce speeds. The committee agreed to pass recommendations to DPW for further review and to identify which measures could be implemented as advisory (nonregulated) signs versus formal regulatory signs.

The discussion also touched on broader planning: members referenced Cape Cod Commission Vision Zero planning and said they would consider short-term delineators and longer-term engineering solutions recommended by traffic audits.

The committee did not adopt any new regulatory traffic controls at the meeting; staff were directed to follow up with site-specific recommendations and to clarify what the town can and cannot enforce under state rules.