Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Installation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Homeowner and commissioners debate visibility of solar panels on Setauket Road; application approved over one dissent
Summary
A homeowner and the commission debated a proposed rooftop and garage solar layout at 194 Setauket Road, focusing on visibility from the street and local exemption boundaries. Commissioners approved the plan with one member opposed after applicants said they moved panels to minimize public view.
A proposal to install rooftop and garage solar panels at 194 Setauket Road in Dennis prompted extended discussion at the Old Kings Highway Regional Historic District Commission before passing with a single dissent.
Michael Tangi (S12), representing the homeowners, described a black-on-black panel layout placed mostly on the garage and moved off the main house to reduce street visibility. The homeowners’ representative said the change reduced the visual impact while still providing meaningful solar production.
"We did move them...trying to make it, as, appealing as possible," Tangi said. Owner Jack (introduced by the presenting contractor) said the family’s decision was grounded in a commitment to renewable energy. "Anything we can do to tell our kids and our grandkids that we're trying to help, slow this down would be a benefit," he said.
Commissioners debated whether the property fell within a local "solar exempt area" and whether roof color and array geometry met the district's guidelines. The Chair (S1) said the panel of commissioners generally wants to permit solar where possible but is mindful of historic character: "We try to approve as many solar panels as we can...our job is to protect the historic look of the entire district." One commissioner repeatedly noted that nearby streets include power lines and other nonhistoric elements that complicate a strict visual standard.
Committee member (S4) moved to approve the application as presented; Committee member (S3) seconded. The motion passed 3–1, with Committee member (S2) recorded as opposed. Commissioners instructed the applicant to pursue standard building permits and to follow the conditions discussed during the hearing.
The commission’s discussion illustrates how local preservation boards weigh renewable-energy goals against district design standards: applicants who reduce street exposure or choose black-on-black panels are likelier to receive approval, but visible arrays on light-colored roofs or with irregular layouts face greater scrutiny.
