Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Work Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advisory Commission narrows strategic focus to MCPD 2026–2030, tasks data committee to review community policing

Advisory Commission on Policing of Montgomery County · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to emphasize review of the Montgomery County Department of Police strategic plan for 2026–2030, kept Strategy 7 (police role in probable cause/pretrial) with revised language to 'continue reviewing', and charged the data committee to review the patrol analysis workload and report back on community policing outcomes.

At its June 8 meeting, the Advisory Commission on Policing of Montgomery County approved several targeted changes to its 2026 work plan and assigned follow‑up tasks to commissioners.

The commission voted to retain Strategy 7 with revised language to "continue reviewing the role of police in the probable cause and pretrial release decisions of District Court Commissioners." Francisco (speaking as "francisco’s iPhone") proposed the change and moved to keep the strategy with that modification; Eva Quittman seconded the motion and the commission approved it by voice vote.

Commissioners also debated Strategy 3 — whether to establish a standing committee to review the Montgomery County Department of Police (MCPD) 2026–2030 strategic plan or keep a broader review charge. Several members urged narrowing the focus to "major in the majors." The commission voted to emphasize review of the MCPD 2026–2030 strategic plan in the work plan language.

On community policing (Strategy 4), members emphasized definitional and measurement issues: Cherri Branson said the term "community policing" lacks a single, precise meaning in department materials and cautioned that a deeper review requires clarity about definitions, goals, and metrics. Sony George, data subcommittee lead, said the data committee is structured to assess outcomes and recommended it review the patrol analysis workload as an initial, evidence‑based step. Brian Bellamy moved, and Terry Walsh seconded, that the data committee review the patrol analysis workload and report back; the motion passed.

The commission also recorded several minor edits to the work plan to highlight equitable policing, public outreach, and the department's new automated record management system. Commissioners agreed the data committee's report on patrol workload will inform any decision about forming a separate community policing subcommittee.

Ending: The work plan updates and committee assignments were approved and will be reflected in the commission's annual report.