Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Danville chair defends cancelling storm-hit meeting, announces tentative defect hearing

Town of Danville Board of Selectmen · March 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Chair Annemarie Inman defended her decision to cancel a Selectmen meeting during a snowstorm, said she will personally cover any required notice costs, and announced a tentative public hearing to address the procedural defect tied to the cancellation.

Annemarie Inman, Chair of the Danville Board of Selectmen, defended her decision to cancel a Selectmen meeting the night of the storm and said she would personally pay any required newspaper posting fee related to a subsequent defect hearing.

Inman told the Board that she made the decision the same day after considering public safety and the condition of roads and Town Hall closure. She said a remedy exists through a defect hearing and that she informed Jamie Dow at the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration about the decision. “If there is a cost, I will pay it personally,” Inman said.

The Board reviewed prior instructions and RSAs for special meetings and public hearings and agreed this meeting could serve as the announcement of a public hearing set tentatively for April 6, contingent on statutory notice timing. Town staff located guidance and a prior folder prepared by legal counsel Matthew Serge that the Board reviewed to confirm timing requirements: a special meeting should be held 21 or more days after voting day, and a public hearing must be held at least seven days prior to the special meeting.

Selectmen also addressed social media criticism stemming from a post by Sheila Johannesen, who had complained that the Selectmen’s cancellation represented a failure. Inman said she would prefer residents raise concerns in person and reiterated that she stands by the safety-based decision and would “make that decision again under the same circumstances.”

Next steps: Vale Van Doorne-Freeman will check statutory notice windows and the Board will confirm the public hearing date and any additional notifications required under state law.