Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Claims Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clerk urges clearer claims process after disallowed office purchase; commissioners discuss notification and policy steps
Summary
Clerk Tammy Flater asked that staff inform claimants when items are disallowed and suggested a pre-approval step for atypical purchases; commissioners discussed consistency and whether a written policy should guide decisions on claims such as an ice machine.
Tammy Flater, Daniels County clerk of court and county superintendent of schools, told commissioners that a recent office-supply claim she submitted was partly disallowed and that the process left her without an explanation. She said the concern is primarily procedural: claimants should be notified when an item is disallowed and given the reason so departments can learn from denials.
Flater described an ice-machine purchase that was questioned by claims staff and said she would have run an atypical purchase by the board had she known it would be disallowed; she emphasized that her priority was process clarity rather than the money. Commissioners agreed that staff should communicate disallowances and their reasons to the submitting departments and discussed whether the county needs a written policy or formalized steps for unusual purchases.
No formal policy change was adopted at the meeting, but commissioners directed staff to improve communications on denied claims and to consider whether a written policy or an internal pre-approval step for nonstandard purchases would reduce confusion.
The discussion also referenced past examples—such as reimbursed purchases by dispatch staff and returned sheriff-department equipment—to underline how inconsistent follow-up can create confusion for departments when claims are denied or reversed.
