Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committee discusses virtual-meeting policy for boards and commissions, decides not to advance
Summary
Council members debated a draft policy to permit virtual attendance by boards and commissions, expressing concerns about abuse, clerk presence, notice requirements and technology; the committee did not advance the measure and recommended further drafting and resident input.
The North Canton City Council's ordinance and rules committee considered a draft resolution to allow boards and commissions to meet virtually under specified conditions but chose not to advance the item this session.
Staff legal counsel and members discussed the city's charter authority and the interplay with state law. Committee members emphasized that any policy should preserve an in-person clerk presence, limit how many members may attend virtually, and be tailored so it would not be used routinely rather than reserved for emergencies or rare circumstances. Several council members said they feared hybrid meetings could be overused and that notice and technical-capacity rules must be clarified before implementation.
Members cited practical concerns including required notice timelines under state law, audio/video quality problems in prior virtual meetings, difficulties ensuring participants could be heard, and the potential for virtual attendance to alter meeting outcomes in small volunteer boards. Staff suggested the draft be refined with specific definitions (e.g., what constitutes an emergency, what boards would be eligible) and returned after additional work and resident input.
