Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Enrollment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MSAD 11 board sends revised limited open‑enrollment policy back to committee after debate over non‑voluntary transfers
Summary
Board members debated proposed policy language that would let the superintendent order non‑voluntary student transfers between elementary schools to maintain class‑size ranges; members raised concerns about family impact and appeals, and the board voted to return the proposal to policy committee for further work.
The MSAD 11 school board discussed a proposed amendment to policy JCD that would add a non‑voluntary transfer clause allowing the superintendent to transfer students between elementary schools upon initial placement to maintain board‑established class sizes. Superintendent Katie Gould described the proposed language as a tool to ‘‘maximize resources while making decisions that are in the best interest of students’’ and said transportation would be provided by the district when such transfers are made.
Board members and community‑facing trustees questioned how the policy would affect families — for example, whether siblings might be split between schools — and whether an appeals process or clearer notice provisions should be included. One board member asked whether the transfer decision would be communicated and whether parents could appeal; staff responded that the transfers would be for one year, reviewed year‑to‑year, and that decisions would be case‑by‑case in consultation with families and principals.
Members also flagged the policy’s potential ripple effects (moving third‑grade students one year could affect capacities in subsequent years) and urged more explicit language on notifications and appeals. Given the breadth of concerns, the board voted to return the JCD language to the policy committee for refinement before a second reading.
What happens next: policy committee will draft clarified language addressing appeal rights, notice requirements and year‑to‑year monitoring and return the revision for a subsequent board reading and possible adoption.
