Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Panhandling Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select board tables proposed panhandling/loitering ordinance amid free‑speech concerns
Summary
Board members discussed a draft panhandling and loitering ordinance adapted from a neighboring town, raised worries about overly broad language and enforcement, and voted to table the measure pending redrafting and consultation with the sheriff's office.
Town staff presented draft language addressing panhandling and loitering adapted from a nearby town. Members expressed support for addressing safety concerns when individuals step into traffic or impede the travel lane, but several said the draft contains overly broad provisions that could chill free expression or be inconsistently enforced.
Members asked the manager to confirm whether the county sheriff’s office would enforce a town ordinance and whether existing statutes already provide authority in the situations the board wants to address. Board members said they preferred a narrowly tailored ordinance focused on blocking roadways or endangering vehicular traffic, rather than broader restrictions that might affect lawful protests or passive presence in public spaces.
After discussion, the board agreed to table the draft ordinance for further refinement, legal review and consultation with the sheriff’s office. Staff will refine the language to clarify that the intent is to address obstruction of vehicular traffic and related safety issues, and return with recommended edits.
