Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Exception Manufactured Home topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves replacement of nonconforming manufactured home in Town of Crystal Lake

Marquette County Board of Adjustment · October 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Marquette County Board of Adjustment granted a special exception allowing the replacement of a legal nonconforming manufactured home at W3155 Dakota Ave., noting the new 900 sq. ft. dwelling will sit in the same location, meet current building code and improve health and habitation standards. The vote was 3-0.

The Marquette County Board of Adjustment on Aug. 28 approved a special exception under Marquette County Code of Ordinances §70.26(D)(9) permitting the replacement of a legal nonconforming manufactured home on Lot 3 of CSM 845 at W3155 Dakota Ave. in the Town of Crystal Lake.

Applicant Thomas Schurk requested the exception to replace the existing unit. The board reviewed application materials and a supporting video and opened the public hearing; no members of the public spoke. After deliberation, the board approved the application by a 3-0 vote, noting the replacement would be 900 square feet, be placed in the same location for the same residential use and would bring the dwelling up to current building-code and health-and-habitation standards.

The board’s approval was framed around conformance with zoning criteria for special exceptions and the project’s stated upgrades to the dwelling’s condition. The hearing record does not specify conditions attached to the approval, nor which board members cast individual votes. The transcript states only the final result: the application passed, 3-0.

The board’s discussion and decision took place in the public hearing portion of the meeting; there were no public comments recorded for this item. Next procedural steps for the project (permits or inspections) were not specified in the hearing record.