Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Small Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears contested small rezoning requests in Spring Hill; one recommendation advanced, another fails
Summary
At the May 21 meeting the commission recommended rezoning 123 Pickicket Street from R3 to T1 (manufactured home) after a public hearing that included emotional testimony from neighborhood residents and the petitioner, while a separate rezoning request for 925 Piggler Street failed on a voice vote.
Get email alerts on the Small Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Prattville Planning Commission on May 21 considered multiple small rezoning requests affecting established neighborhoods in the Spring Hill area and heard extended public comment focused on community character, property values and traffic.
123 Pickicket Street: Staff recommended denial for the petitioner Tanget L. Anderson’s request to rezone a roughly 0.17‑acre lot from R3 (single‑family) to T1 (manufactured home) on the grounds that the request could amount to spot zoning, conflicted with the future land‑use designation and the lot width (scaled at about 50 feet) fell short of the 60‑foot minimum that T1 typically requires. Multiple neighbors opposed additional mobile homes in Spring Hill, saying existing mobile homes had depressed lending and property values in the area and that the neighborhood had worked to attract single‑family investment. The petitioner, a disabled veteran who said she needs to move closer to family for medical reasons, said she was not planning to rent the home and that the lot could accommodate a manufactured home more easily than a conventional house without variances. The commission read a resolution recommending rezoning 123 Pickicket to T1 and took a vote; the transcript records the commission moving and seconding the recommendation and proceeding to a voice vote.
925 Piggler Street: A separate petition by Vonzel Pernell Jr. to rezone 925 Piggler Street from R3 to T1 was moved and seconded, but the motion failed on a voice vote when the commission voted down the recommendation.
Why it matters: the small rezoning requests highlight tensions between residents aiming to preserve single‑family neighborhood character and petitioners seeking placement options for manufactured housing, sometimes to accommodate family or health needs. Staff repeatedly cautioned that spot zoning—changing a single parcel’s zoning in a way that contradicts surrounding land use or the comprehensive plan—is contrary to best planning practice and could be vulnerable to appeal.
What’s next: the commission’s recommendation on 123 Pickicket will be forwarded to city council for final action; the failed motion on 925 Piggler ends that request at the commission level.

