Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contracts And Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kennedale ISD board unanimously awards 2026 roofing contract to Roof Technology Partners
Summary
The Kennedale ISD Board voted unanimously to award a contract to Roof Technology Partners for roofing work tied to the 2023 bond after a procurement review that evaluated five proposals and recommended Rooftech as top scorer.
The Kennedale Independent School District Board of Trustees unanimously approved a contract with Roof Technology Partners for 2026 roofing improvements related to the district's 2023 bond program.
At the June meeting procurement staff said the district received five proposals and convened a scoring committee with district staff and the district's engineering firm. Staff told trustees that one bidder, Paragon Roofing, submitted an incomplete, late package and scored substantially lower as a result. The committee's evaluation singled out Roof Technology Partners ("Rooftech") for its pricing, school-district references and local presence; the committee recommended Rooftech as the highest-scoring proposer.
The contract covers three priority areas identified by staff: recoating two existing metal roofs (the high school indoor facility and the junior high fieldhouse), replacement and sealing of the stadium press box roof and related flashings, and replacement or repair of gutters, downspouts and fasteners. District staff said the work is intended to reduce leaks and extend the service life of the affected roofs.
Dr. Maria Douglas moved approval of the contract; Natalie McCay seconded. The board voted in favor by voice and the motion carried unanimously. No individual vote tally was recorded in the public minutes.
Procurement staff noted that the district's available bond funds were expected to cover the work; staff referenced a "6.9" figure in the presentation as the remaining budget line but did not specify units or whether that number is in millions. The district said it would present the contract for formal award as part of the board action taken at the meeting.
The district's bidding packet and the scoring sheet were available to trustees before the motion, and staff said they followed standard evaluation criteria for price, references and completeness of submittals. The board did not discuss a contract price during the public motion-and-vote segment.
The board also approved the consent agenda earlier in the meeting, which included other routine business items, by a separate, unanimous voice vote.
