Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pool Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bedford parks board tables decision on allowing life vests at John Lowi Municipal Pool

Bedford Parks Board · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed whether to permit Coast Guard–approved life vests (beyond puddle jumpers) at John Lowi Municipal Pool; concerns about proper fit for small children and liability led the board to vote to table the issue while staff research policies and insurance implications.

The Bedford parks board discussed whether to allow life vests at John Lowi Municipal Pool beyond the puddle-jumper devices currently permitted and voted to table the issue until staff can gather more information on safety and liability.

Board members said neighboring towns allow Coast Guard–approved vests but do not verify fit. One member said that approach leaves lifeguards and staff unable to confirm proper sizing for each child, which could increase liability and risk in rescue situations. Another member noted small children (a one-year-old was referenced) present special concerns about fit and safety.

Staff reported the only consistent requirement in nearby towns was that vests be Coast Guard approved; those towns did not conduct fit checks. Board members discussed limiting vest use to areas near the separating rope or to adult-supervised shallow water and considered signage or a liability acknowledgment, but several members said the idea raises a “whole can of worms” and places burdens on lifeguards.

A motion to table the proposal for further research was made, seconded, and approved by voice vote. Staff members were asked to consult with insurance contacts and other pools to develop recommended language and safety procedures before the board revisits the subject.

No policy change was adopted at the meeting.