Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Highland officials weigh local limits, safety outreach after e-bike incidents
Summary
Highland police described two recent e-bike collisions and reviewed state e-bike classifications and enforcement limits. Officials discussed signage, education and helmet distribution and asked staff to return with options rather than immediate strict enforcement.
Chief Carole Widman outlined recent incidents and legal context for electric bicycles as the Highland City Council discussed local steps to protect riders and pedestrians.
“Class 1: Pedal-assist only, up to 20 mph. Class 2: Throttle-assisted, up to 20 mph. Class 3: Pedal-assist, up to 28 mph,” Chief Carole Widman said, summarizing the state’s classifications and noting the department has investigated two recent crashes in which riders on e-bikes struck stopped vehicles. She said Class 3 e-bikes 750 watts or higher require registration and operators must be at least 16 under recent state rules.
The chief told council that any local restrictions — for example, banning certain classes from Glik Park trails or sidewalks — would require clear signage and local enforcement. “Anything we put into an ordinance means the police department must enforce. I don’t want my officers out ruining kids’ summer,” Chief Widman said, urging a balanced approach.
Council members voiced safety concerns for children and for streets with narrow parking. Councilwoman Sloan said she worried that “kids do not know how to properly handle the bikes.” Councilman Klaus suggested offering a safety class; Councilman Napper and Councilwoman Bellm supported education and community outreach. Chief Widman suggested officers respond to incidents with a parent conversation rather than immediate citation and noted helmet distribution at upcoming city events as a possible tactic.
Director Cook and City Manager Conrad referenced other municipalities’ recent actions and anticipated a broader public education effort as state rules take effect. The council did not adopt an ordinance at the meeting; members asked staff to return with options that might include education campaigns, signage, targeted enforcement strategies and potential regulatory language for future consideration.
The council spent the remainder of its June 1 meeting on routine agenda items and formal votes unrelated to e-bike policy. The council is expected to revisit e-bike options after staff prepares recommended next steps.
