Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Permit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission conditions CUP for Millerwood Avenue chiller/loading dock on planting plan and screening

Winchester Planning Commission · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission moved to forward a conditional use permit for deviations related to chiller units and front-setback standards at 620 Millwood Avenue with a condition that the applicant provide a planting plan showing screening around the chiller/wall; the motion carried by voice vote.

At the June 16 meeting planning staff introduced CUP 26-2, a conditional use permit application by Greenway Engineering on behalf of Shenandoah University for deviations from corridor enhancement standards at 620 Millwood Avenue related to front setback and the placement of accessory equipment (chiller units).

Staff noted updated submittals and renderings in the packet. The applicant’s representative described three renderings showing approaches from Millwood Avenue and emphasized landscaping and a variable-height screen wall: in the applicant’s description, the chillers are planned at a lower elevation and the cutaway detail shows the chillers "located at a lower elevation...10 feet and 3 quarters of a foot depth down into where the chillers are" with exterior screen walls and supplemental plantings.

Commissioners raised repeated concerns that the application lacked a formal planting/landscape plan demonstrating what screening would be provided around the wall and loading bay, making it difficult for staff to determine whether the CUP standards are met. A commissioner moved to forward the conditional use permit with a condition that "a planting plan be provided around the wall to set the standard for the conditional use permit." The motion was seconded and carried on the voice vote recorded in the transcript ("Ayes carry").

After the vote staff noted that the waiver for the loading bay (a related site-plan consultation item) would proceed through site-plan review with the screening elements incorporated. No members of the public took the podium during the public-hearing segment of this item and staff reported two neighbor letters in the packet related to the university campus overall but not as speakers at the hearing.

The commission's action forwards the CUP (with the planting-plan condition) to the next review stage where the detailed landscape plan, site-plan materials and potential loading-dock waiver will be finalized.