Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Multi Family Regulations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer urges narrower units and taller buildings to lower housing costs; commission weighs trade-offs

Gunnison Planning Commission · March 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A developer proposed reducing unit widths and garage sizes, allowing three-story apartments and exempting HOA-controlled developments from certain storage requirements to lower per-unit costs; staff flagged a 35-foot height limit tied to fire equipment and the commission favored a project-specific zone for a 20-acre elementary school site.

Joshua (Josh) Flake of JL Construction told the commission that minimum building-width and garage requirements are obstacles to more-affordable townhomes and apartments. Flake proposed reducing the code's 24-foot minimum building width to about 20–22 feet and allowing single-car garages instead of the current 18-by-18-foot garage per unit, saying those changes would reduce per-unit costs (Flake cited a reduction from about $350,000 to roughly $300,000 per unit).

Flake also advocated permitting three-story apartment buildings (about 45 feet) to bring down per-unit costs. City Administrator Dennis Marker told the commission the existing 35-foot height limit is tied to the fire department's lack of a ladder truck, indicating that a taller limit would have public-safety implications unless equipment or response capabilities change.

On storage, commissioners discussed the current requirement that units in developments of five or more provide 60 square feet of storage; Flake suggested exempting communities governed by a homeowners association from that requirement.

Flake described a "horizontal mixed-use" concept for the 20-acre former elementary school property that would combine offices, townhomes and apartments. Commissioners expressed a preference for creating a special zone specific to that parcel rather than adopting broad, citywide code changes.

The commission discussed trade-offs among affordability, building form and public-safety constraints but took no formal action on these multi-family proposals during the meeting.