Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orleans Historic Commission advises ZBA that 66–76 Route 6A proposal appears incompatible with streetscape
Summary
The commission drafted and voted to send an advisory opinion to the Zoning Board of Appeals saying the RFP-selected proposal for 66 and 76 Route 6A appears incompatible with the existing streetscape and could harm the historic character of the immediate area; members agreed to forward the opinion to the Architectural Review Board as well.
Members reviewed materials for a multi-phase RFP-selected redevelopment of 66 and 76 Route 6A (Governor Prince property) brought forward by a housing developer team (applicants referenced in the packet). Commissioners raised consistent concerns about the project’s scale, massing and height — including requests for variances that move the buildings closer to lot boundaries and increase maximum height well above typical downtown limits.
One commissioner summarized the commission’s planned advisory language to the Zoning Board of Appeals as a concise statement that the proposal “appears incompatible with the streetscape and would be detrimental to the historic character of the immediate area.” The commission voted to send that advisory opinion and to circulate it to the Architectural Review Board and other relevant town bodies ahead of their meetings.
Commissioners acknowledged the proposal was the result of a public RFP process and that final design review and variances remain subject to regulatory processes; nevertheless they agreed the commission has an advisory role and felt it should weigh in to preserve context and scale where possible. Members discussed attending the Architectural Review Board meeting on the proposal and drafting a focused, constructive recommendation that suggests design-scale changes and emphasizes compatibility with nearby historic buildings.
Next steps: the commission asked staff to prepare the advisory letter for distribution and to provide packet references and schematic materials to the Architectural Review Board and ZBA for their upcoming hearings.
