Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transit Definitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeland commission adopts standard definitions for 'unmet transit needs' to begin hearing process
Summary
The Lakeland Transportation Commission on May 19 approved its annual definitions of "unmet transit needs," a procedural step that triggers public hearings to determine whether Transportation Development Act funds should be used for transit services rather than streets or planning.
The Lakeland Transportation Commission on May 19 approved a resolution adopting its annual definitions of “unmet transit needs,” a procedural step that starts the public-hearing process required to decide whether Transportation Development Act funds should be spent on transit services.
Ethan Gray, deputy director of community development, presented the item on behalf of LTC Executive Secretary Sam Booth. "This is an item that we bring forward, on an annual basis," Gray said, adding that the definitions in the draft “have haven't changed over the years.” He described the next steps: staff will hold public hearings to determine whether any unmet transit needs identified are "reasonable to meet," and the commission will then decide whether findings are made that affect how the local Transportation Development Act funds are used.
The definitions govern when Transportation Development Act funds allocated to the local transportation fund may be reserved for transit service. Gray explained that if the commission finds there are no unmet transit needs, or that none are reasonable to meet, those funds can instead be used for streets, roads, or planning work.
During discussion, a commissioner raised a wording concern in the staff summary. The speaker — addressed in the transcript as Supervisor Dobson — noted the draft’s phrasing lists three possible findings but omits an "or" that would improve clarity: the finding should read that the commission finds either (1) there are no unmet transit needs; (2) there are no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet; or (3) there are unmet transit needs, including needs that are reasonable to meet. Gray acknowledged the point and said staff would make that adjustment "early next year." The transcript records the clarification exchange but does not indicate a different substantive policy change to the definition.
A motion to approve the resolution was moved and seconded and taken by voice vote. The transcript records multiple "aye" and "no" responses; it does not include a clear roll-call tally. The record indicates the commission approved the resolution and then adjourned.
Next steps: staff will proceed with the public hearing process required under the Transportation Development Act and return to the commission if findings are identified that would change how local funds are used.
