Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice Chiller topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves $858,788 award and reallocates $900,000 to replace juvenile justice center chiller

Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Oklahoma County commissioners approved awarding a $858,788 contract to WSM MEP for a design‑build chiller replacement at the juvenile justice center and approved reallocating $900,000 from capital projects to fund the work; both measures passed by voice vote.

Oklahoma County commissioners voted to fund and award the replacement of the juvenile justice center’s chiller system, approving a staff recommendation to award the design‑build contract to WSM MEP for $858,788.

Staff told the board that two teams — TNT Industrial and WSM MEP — responded to the request for qualifications and both were judged qualified. “I’m recommending award to the most qualified and lowest firm WSM MEP incorporated and the project total is $858,788 and this is contingent upon encumbrance of funds,” a county staff member said.

Separately, county staff (Brandy) presented item 19 to reallocate $900,000 from a capital projects line (the JG JJC courtroom) into an established line item for the juvenile justice center chiller project to ensure funding is available. The commission approved that reallocation by voice vote.

The award and the reallocation were presented as companion steps: the contract award establishes the contractor and price pending encumbrance, and the reallocation moves internal capital to cover the project. Staff said interviews were held on June 9 and that the award recommendation incorporated facility and juvenile department input.

The motions passed on voice votes with commissioners saying “I.” No roll‑call votes or member‑level dissent were recorded in the transcript.

Next steps: staff indicated the award is contingent on encumbrance of funds and will proceed once the encumbrance is in place; no implementation timetable was provided at the meeting.