Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Habitat Restoration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press commission to slow invasive‑removal plan at 42 Scarsdale Road; hearing continued to Aug. 7
Summary
Abutters told the Dennis Conservation Commission that a proposed invasive‑species removal and driveway relocation at 42 Scarsdale Road risks wildlife corridors and mature trees; the applicant said native plants will remain and the work will be monitored. The commission continued the item to Aug. 7 for site visits and further information.
The Dennis Conservation Commission on July 17 heard more than an hour of public comment about a proposed habitat restoration and driveway relocation at 42 Scarsdale Road that would remove invasive shrubs and replant native vegetation across parts of the riverfront and bordering vegetated wetland.
Theresa Sprague of BlueFlex Design, representing owner Karen Devine, told commissioners the plan would remove an existing semicircular driveway and stone patio in the 50‑foot buffer, expand a new permeable driveway slightly into the buffer to the west, and restore about 14,695 square feet of wetland and riparian area with native trees and shrubs. “None of the native vegetation is proposed for removal,” Sprague said, and the team proposed 19 replacement trees and a 3‑year monitoring program with follow‑up invasive‑species treatments.
Several abutters pushed back. Annie Walker, who owns land adjacent to the proposed work, said parts of the map understate existing trees and that some of the canopy the applicants propose to remove actually sits on her property. “This is a wildlife corridor,” Walker said, describing denning, turtle nesting and daily wildlife passage through the bog. She asked the commission to curb mechanical removal and to walk the site with the applicant before giving approval.
Other neighbors echoed concerns about erosion, loss of cover and whether the removal of invasives — even if followed by plantings — would provide immediate habitat for wildlife. “Taking all of that out is going to take away where the animals can be,” Claudia of nearby Scarsdale Road said, supporting Walker’s request to preserve connections between nearby bogs.
BlueFlex’s project manager, Caitlin Camilleri, described selective invasive removal using a cut‑and‑wipe herbicide method that leaves root systems in place and limits soil disturbance. Mike Tanis, also of BlueFlex, said the plan includes hand work wherever possible, mechanical assistance only for hauling debris, and temporary irrigation to establish new plantings. “Once the area is restored, we feel the improvement to wildlife habitat value will be significantly improved,” he said.
Commissioners recognized the ecological sensitivity and asked for more field verification. Staff suggested special conditions and additional field visits; commission members urged BlueFlex to coordinate on‑site flagging so abutters could see which plants are targeted. The commission voted to continue the matter to its Aug. 7 meeting to allow site visits with staff and the applicant and to collect further information before issuing any order.
The continuation leaves open whether the commission will approve the proposed limited expansion of a permeable driveway into the 50‑foot buffer, and whether conditions will restrict mechanical equipment and require staged invasive removal and monitoring. The item now returns to the commission with staff and abutter site‑visit notes expected before the August meeting.
