Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sb608 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Author urges expanded condom access in schools as opponents cite parental authority

California State Assembly Education Committee · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sen. Menjivar's SB608 would prohibit schools from blocking school health centers from making condoms available to students during education or upon request; witnesses and organizations split along public‑health and parental‑authority lines. The committee placed the bill on call and later recorded a final committee tally of 6–1 in favor.

Sen. Menjivar presented Senate Bill 608 as a measure to address rising sexually transmitted infection rates among young people by expanding access to condoms in schools and aligning Department of Education authority with the California Healthy Youth Act. "SB608 at the core is looking to protect ... the increase of STIs amongst young people," Menjivar said during opening remarks.

The bill would, under the committee's jurisdiction, prevent schools (grades 7–12) from blocking school‑based health centers from making condoms available during public‑health education sessions or when a student requests them. Menjivar said the measure also prevents retail pharmacies from asking for identification in some circumstances and would authorize the Department of Education to ensure compliance with existing Healthy Youth Act requirements.

Students and health organizations testified in support. "Expanding access to condoms in schools and communities ... would support us to lead healthy lives," said Joaquin Avalos, a junior at Da Vinci High School, who testified on behalf of hundreds of students. Stephanie Ocampo, a board member of the California School Based Health Alliance, described school‑based health centers as "trusted accessible" sources of confidential reproductive care and cited CDC survey figures to warn of low condom use and elevated STI risk among some students.

Opponents focused on parental authority and public‑health framing. Greg Burr of the California Family Council argued SB608 "builds a separate channel for handing out contraception entirely outside of" existing opt‑out frameworks and said it could allow seventh graders to obtain condoms without parental notification. Burr also cited CDC language about correlations between early sexual initiation and higher‑risk behavior to argue for investment in parent‑child communication rather than the bill's approach.

Sen. Menjivar rebutted opposition concerns in closing remarks, saying the bill does not endorse or encourage sexual activity and is intended to reduce harm where activity occurs. "What we can do is ... provide them with the tools to be safe," she said.

The committee did not immediately take final action; the bill was put "on call" during an initial roll call and, after the roll was left open for additional votes, the committee recorded a final tally of 6–1 in favor of passing SB608 as amended to the Health Committee. No governor or implementation timeline was discussed at the hearing.

The next procedural step is the Health Committee consideration as noted by the Education Committee's motion. The committee left the roll open for add‑ons before adjourning.