Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oakmont Council approves crossing guard resolution, warrants, utilities payments and construction invoices

Oakmont Borough Council · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 15 (recognizing school crossing guards) and approved the warrant list, wastewater-plant partial payment and construction-inspection payment; motions passed by voice vote and exact tallies were not recorded in the transcript.

Oakmont Borough Council approved several motions and payments during its June 16 meeting, including a ceremonial resolution recognizing school crossing guards and routine financial actions.

Resolution No. 15 of 2026: Council moved to adopt a resolution recognizing Oakmont Borough school crossing guards for their service; the motion was moved by Deb and seconded by Jen P, and the council passed the resolution by voice vote. The resolution text expresses the council’s gratitude for crossing guards’ service to students and the community.

Warrant list: Council approved the warrant list totaling $455,670.17 on a motion and second with no discussion.

Wastewater treatment plant payment: Council approved partial payment No. 10 to Lone Pine Construction Inc. for wastewater treatment plant upgrades in the amount of $521,621.10; staff estimated the project will take roughly another year plus a few months to complete.

Construction inspection payment: Council approved payment No. 10 for construction inspection services in the amount of $26,388.

Votes and tallies: The transcript records the motions, seconds and voice votes but does not list individual roll-call tallies for these items. Where the transcript records a unanimous voice vote, the article notes unanimity; where counts were not provided the exact tallies are recorded as not specified.