Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public question at forum spotlights alleged misconduct; candidates call for oversight and independent review
Summary
At a Grand Rapids police chief forum an audience member alleging assault and wrongful charges asked candidates what would prevent such cases; candidates urged use of internal affairs, civilian oversight and legal remedies while asking for case details to allow review.
During a public forum for Grand Rapids' police chief finalists, an audience member who identified himself as Lamar said he was assaulted by Grand Rapids officers on April 5, 2024, was wrongfully charged and later acquitted. The allegation prompted candidates to underline the role of civilian oversight and transparent internal investigation.
Lamar told the panel: "I was assaulted by the Grand Rapids Police Department and I was wrongfully charged," and said officers lied in reports and committed perjury on the stand, according to his remarks at the forum.
Candidates responded that the forum itself could not adjudicate those claims but emphasized avenues for review. Deputy Chief Mark Bliss said the allegation underscores why an independent Office of Police Accountability (OPA) and oversight matter so that outside reviewers can evaluate cases impartially. "That's the perfect example that you just made to every single person here regarding the need for the OPA and oversight," Bliss said.
Joe Trigg, who has commanded internal affairs in the past, asked for specifics and documentation so the matter could be examined through appropriate channels; he said internal affairs and external oversight should work together. Raphael Diaz similarly said accountability procedures should be unbiased and thorough, and that progressive discipline or termination are appropriate when investigators find abusive or corrupt behavior.
The candidates advised the questioner to pursue legal and administrative remedies available to him while noting that the forum did not resolve the merits of the allegation. Several candidates reiterated support for transparent investigations, prompt release of body-worn camera footage where allowed by law, and cooperation with civilian oversight bodies to maintain public confidence.
Status and next steps: Candidates and panelists encouraged the complainant to present documentation to internal affairs and oversight authorities; the forum did not adjudicate the claim. The city manager noted interviews with finalists would continue the following day, and any departmental policy changes would be subject to future administrative or legislative steps.
