Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge RSU 38 to share consolidation background and post strategic‑planning meetings

RSU 38 School Board · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Three residents asked the RSU 38 board to ensure consultants have background on small elementary schools and RSU 3A consolidation and to confirm whether an RFP for strategic‑plan consultants has been issued; they requested that plan‑to‑plan meetings be publicly posted.

Three residents used the public comment period to press the RSU 38 board on transparency and the consultant selection process for the district strategic plan.

Holly Stevenson of Wayne told the board a letter from two town committees had been sent to consultants and asked that the consultants be made aware of the founding agreement among the unit’s four towns and the importance of the district’s small elementary schools. “I just wanted to underscore the importance of the information that's being provided to those consultants as they look at what they're going to suggest,” Stevenson said, urging that consultants recognize the role of the four elementary schools in the unit’s founding constitution.

Deborah Bader of Mount Vernon asked the board to ensure plan‑to‑plan and strategic planning committee meetings are publicly posted so that community members who are closely following the process can attend. “I would like to attend,” Bader said, and she asked that meeting notices be made available.

Diane Chick, also of Mount Vernon, sought clarity on procurement steps: she asked whether an RFP (request for proposals) had been issued to potential consultants and renewed the call to provide consultants with RSU 3A consolidation information so they understand local context. “I’m just looking for a little understanding…whether an RFP needs to be issued… and if that has been done yet,” Chick said.

Board members did not make decisions during public comment; the speakers asked for procedural transparency and for the board to ensure consultants receive historical and consolidation background. The transcript does not record an immediate staff response with details about the RFP status or specific next steps; community members were told to direct comments to the superintendent.

The questions and requests raised during public comment may inform how the board or superintendent frames consultant materials and posts future committee meeting notices.